Carrierlytics County Coverage Guide

Rutherford County, TN Cell Phone Coverage Map & Network Rankings (2026)

Find the best cell phone network and plan to use in Rutherford County, TN.

Using FCC mobile coverage data across cities and ZIP codes in Rutherford County, TN, Carrierlytics compares the top-performing networks and the cheapest plans that use them.

Rutherford County, TN

Cell phone coverage map for Rutherford County, TN

Zoom in for local detail. Tap or click a colored area to see coverage and signal details. On mobile, use two fingers to move the map.

Coverage Key
Less covered More covered
Darker areas mean the carrier covers more of that location.

Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, © CARTO. Rendered with MapLibre. FCC BDC mobile coverage processed by Carrierlytics.

Loading coverage map...

Cell phone coverage rankings by network in Rutherford County, TN

#1

T-Mobile

Coverage Score 87.7
In Rutherford County, TN
Overall
93.7%
4G LTE
93.7% avg. -92 dBm 4G LTE signal where 4G LTE coverage exists: avg. -92 dBm
5G
85.8% avg. -88 dBm 5G signal where 5G coverage exists: avg. -88 dBm
Fast 5G
68.5% avg. -85 dBm Fast 5G signal where Fast 5G coverage exists: avg. -85 dBm
#2

Verizon

Coverage Score 78.0
In Rutherford County, TN
Overall
97.6%
4G LTE
97.6% avg. -90 dBm 4G LTE signal where 4G LTE coverage exists: avg. -90 dBm
5G
58.3% avg. -91 dBm 5G signal where 5G coverage exists: avg. -91 dBm
Fast 5G
39.2% avg. -86 dBm Fast 5G signal where Fast 5G coverage exists: avg. -86 dBm
#3

AT&T

Coverage Score 74.4
In Rutherford County, TN
Overall
96.8%
4G LTE
96.7% avg. -104 dBm 4G LTE signal where 4G LTE coverage exists: avg. -104 dBm
5G
83.8% avg. -109 dBm 5G signal where 5G coverage exists: avg. -109 dBm
Fast 5G
55.6% avg. -106 dBm Fast 5G signal where Fast 5G coverage exists: avg. -106 dBm
Sponsored US Mobile

Coverage varies by neighborhood. Your carrier shouldn’t.

US Mobile lets you switch between all three major networks, so you can choose the one that works best where you actually use your phone.

Choose your network
Dark Star Light Speed Warp 5G
Unlimited plans from
$22.50/mo
Phone + home internet bundle from
$47/mo
Shop US Mobile

Pricing, network access, switching terms, and home internet availability may vary.

Coverage by city in Rutherford County, TN

Cities and towns are shown for county-level comparison. Coverage percentages use land-area only coverage.

City Verizon AT&T T-Mobile
Christiana, TN 100.0% 100.0% 83.9% 48.2% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 91.1% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 96.9%
Eagleville, TN 100.0% 100.0% 68.0% 50.7% 100.0% 100.0% 86.7% 77.3% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 96.0%
La Vergne, TN 100.0% 100.0% 82.3% 64.6% 100.0% 99.6% 96.6% 65.8% 99.8% 99.8% 99.1% 92.4%
Lascassas, TN 93.7% 93.5% 35.2% 19.4% 94.3% 94.2% 77.0% 53.8% 77.6% 77.6% 66.3% 45.5%
Milton, TN 70.3% 70.3% 13.1% 4.4% 85.7% 85.7% 47.5% 29.0% 68.6% 68.6% 43.9% 16.1%
Murfreesboro, TN 100.0% 100.0% 94.6% 82.6% 100.0% 100.0% 99.2% 70.2% 100.0% 100.0% 99.9% 97.3%
Rockvale, TN 100.0% 100.0% 75.5% 54.7% 100.0% 100.0% 99.1% 88.7% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 97.2%
Smyrna, TN 100.0% 100.0% 75.5% 57.5% 99.4% 99.4% 95.7% 59.6% 100.0% 100.0% 99.9% 95.1%
Walterhill, TN 100.0% 100.0% 61.6% 50.7% 98.6% 98.6% 93.2% 80.8% 100.0% 100.0% 97.3% 74.0%
Nashville, TN 99.2% 99.2% 70.2% 52.9% 95.9% 95.8% 84.7% 56.6% 94.3% 94.3% 88.9% 77.3%
Rural Hill, TN 100.0% 100.0% 64.7% 34.3% 98.0% 98.0% 89.2% 53.9% 100.0% 100.0% 95.1% 86.3%

About The Coverage Data

Coverage and signal estimates are derived by Carrierlytics from carrier-reported data in the FCC’s National Broadband Coverage Map, last updated in June 2025. “Percent covered” shows how much of the city or ZIP code area has a carrier signal, whether weak or strong. Signal bars show the estimated average signal strength in areas of Rutherford County, TN where that carrier has coverage.

If a carrier says you should have service but you do not, run a challenge test with the FCC Mobile Speed Test App. The FCC uses those results to check carrier-submitted coverage data and requires a carrier response when enough tests show a pattern of inaccurate coverage reporting.